Network Firm News

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

GOODELL DEVRIES’ VICTORY PROMOTES PUBLIC INTEREST BY FACILITATING MIDWIVES’ CONSULTATIONS WITH CONSULTING PHYSICIANS
Don DeVries, Kelly Iverson and Nichole Nesbitt won a summary judgment on behalf of Washington Hospital Center and one of its physicians in a multi-million dollar medical malpractice case in the District of Columbia. In a case where plaintiff’s representative claimed that a baby’s severe neurologic injuries resulted from a physician consultants bad advice concerning the baby’s mother’s attempt to have a vaginal birth after having two previous cesarean section deliveries.

Plaintiff sued the midwives who provided the mother’s prenatal care and a physician with whom one of the midwives consulted prior to delivery.

The plaintiffs contended that the physician owed a duty to the mother to instruct the midwives and, if necessary, the patient herself, that she was not an appropriate candidate for a vaginal delivery. The defense argued that a brief consultation between the consulting physician and the treating midwife did not give rise to a duty to the mother because the physician never treated, evaluated, spoke with, saw, or met the mother; he only provided advice – which the midwives were free to accept or reject – during a less than 10-minute discussion with the midwives.
The Court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment, holding that the consulting physician’s “isolated and non-binding consultation” failed to give rise to a duty on his part to the mother. Importantly, the Court also expressed concern over the negative impact on public policy that would result from the imposition of a legal duty in this situation. In the District of Columbia, midwives are independent practitioners who are permitted to provide care for pregnant women without the supervision of a doctor. The Court held that, under those circumstances, “encouraging the nurse-midwives to consult with obstetrics professionals is in the public interest. Conversely, extending liability to such consultations, without more, contradicts that interest.”
 

Firm Blogs

Health Law Rx HR Defense
TN Labor Talk
IP Law Alert News Real Property and Environmental Law E-Discovery Law Alerts Employment Law Alerts
AL Appellate Watch White Collar Wire (Twitter)
Litigation Law IP Law
Affordable Housing Energy and Environment Hot Topics in the Middle Market Legal Diagnostics Life Sciences NP Privacy Partner Taxes
Professional Liability Midwest HOA Longterm Care Defense Missouri Property Tax Fire Science Law CPA Law Employer Law Bad Faith Physician Law Trucking Defense Wealth Planning
SWIPLit Emerging Business Labor & Employment and the Law